Francesco Sisci warns against "the old blame-game against Chinese authorities" —
Beware the Tiananmen reflex. The kneejerk reaction is to think that "if there are dead people on the streets, it must be Beijing's fault."
Mr. Sisci reminds us, "There is no evidence of large-scale indiscriminate shooting by the police as accounting for the 156 deaths and over 800 injured." In contrast, he states, "There is abundant evidence that the protesters set the city on fire, causing the casualties directly (by beating people) or indirectly (because innocents were in the buses on fire)."
This does not mean Beijing is blameless, however. Mr. Sisci mentions the "old tension between the Han and Uyghurs, sprouting from the lack of a sense of one Chinese nation" and the "growing... ethnic Han nationalism... [that] widens the divide with other minorities." In fact, he says, "Han nationalism kindles and feeds other ethnic groups' nationalism and it all becomes a vicious circle." Beijing is to blame because it fans "Han nationalism and pride to win the support of the rich and powerful Chinese diaspora which supported China's growth in the past three decades."
Importantly, Mr. Sisci highlights the fact that "nationalism came to China around the turn of the 19th century, when Beijing was confronting Western nation-states that, unlike imperial China, had a strong sentiment of state unity." Before that time, he reminds us that "there had been no Han nationalism to speak of." Making matters worse, the monster Mao, by "introducing Soviet-style 'protections' for other nationalities living in China, .... instituted for the first time minute divisions among the ethnic groups living in China, which de facto promoted national and ethnic sentiments that previously were more blurred."
The solution, like those to most modern problems, can be found in pre-modernity. Mr. Sisci suggests, "It is necessary to drop the institution of ethnic nationalities and develop a Chinese dream - inclusive of non-ethnic Han - and to revamp the old imperial idea of
huaren, people who belong to the new Chinese culture."
China, it has been pointed out, is not a nation but a civilization, analogous not to a France, a Germany, or even an America but to
the Holy Roman Empire, or perhaps more accurately (since China is not united by a common creed), its descendant the
Austro-Hungarian Empire. Catholics better than most remember that all hell broke lose after those two political entities were obliterated.
Labels: Commies, Europe is the Faith, Modernist Tomfoolery, Race Matters, The Age of Faith, The Middle Kingdom, Traditionalism